by Adam S. Chilton & Eric A. Posner
VOLUME 56 :: No. 2
VOLUME 56 :: No. 2
Victim Testimony in International and Hybrid Criminal Courts: Narrative Opportunities, Challenges, and Fair Trial Demands
The Martens Clause was a last-minute compromise that saved the 1899 Hague Convention with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land. In its original formulation, the clause shielded individuals under “the protection and empire” of international law, principles of humanity, and the dictates of the public conscience. F. F. Martens, its author, was Russia’s greatest international law scholar and an extraordinary diplomat. He saw no application for his work in the nineteenth-century internal affairs of states, notwithstanding the transnational terrorism that plagued (and ultimately destroyed) the Russian Empire. Martens’s worldview is no longer our own. State sovereignty is no longer an absolute value in public international law, in part because of the well-known human rights revolution of the twentieth century. As a result, the reach and importance of the Martens Clause has grown. This history helps refute the claim that international humanitarian law is ill-suited for twenty-first century transnational terrorism. But the Clause is not, and never was, a panacea.
| VIEW PDF
NEWS & EVENTS
NEWSLETTERSign up to join our newsletter
Although this organization has members who are University of Virginia students and may have University employees associated or engaged inits activities and affairs, the organization is not a part of or an agency of the University. It is a separate and independent organization which is responsible for and manages its own activities and affairs. The University does not direct, supervise or control the organization and is not responsible for the organization’s contracts, acts or omissions.